This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
khai_deckbuilding [2024/05/21 15:57] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | khai_deckbuilding [2024/10/08 16:38] (current) – [Chargen vs Custom Cyberdeck] Note time needed to build deck khai | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This is not an in-depth guide to decking, programming, | This is not an in-depth guide to decking, programming, | ||
- | IMPORTANT: If you read nothing else, understand that matrix hosts resist your actions by rolling against your detection factor (see: HELP DETECTION FACTOR), so it is highly recommended | + | IMPORTANT: If you read nothing else, understand that matrix hosts resist your actions by rolling against your detection factor (see: HELP DETECTION FACTOR), so a DF of 6 is highly recommended |
==== Programs ==== | ==== Programs ==== | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
===== Decker Creation ===== | ===== Decker Creation ===== | ||
==== Chargen vs Custom Cyberdeck ==== | ==== Chargen vs Custom Cyberdeck ==== | ||
- | Probably the most important decision when creating a decker is whether you intend to initially rely on a store-bought cyberdeck or if you intend to build your own custom deck as soon as possible. A store-bought cyberdeck (including the CMT Avatar that the pre-built decker archetype starts with) has a cold ASIST, which does not allow us to use your hacking pool. | + | Probably the most important decision when creating a decker is whether you intend to initially rely on a store-bought cyberdeck or if you intend to build your own custom deck as soon as possible. A store-bought cyberdeck (including the CMT Avatar that the pre-built decker archetype starts with) lets you jump into decking immediately (rather than having to spend a week IRL on building), but has a cold ASIST, which does not allow us to use your hacking pool. |
However, access to the hacking pool means that a custom MPCP 6 deck can often perform better than a CMT Avatar, depending on host ratings, even though the Avatar has a higher MPCP rating. The plot below shows a comparison between a CMT Avatar and a custom MPCP 6. Both deckers are assumed to have started with Computer 6 and have picked up all relevant cyberware and bioware. Because the decker with the custom MPCP 6 has spent significant time/effort in building their deck as well as programming rating 6 utilities, it is reasonable to assume that the decker with the CMT Avatar has also taken some effort to increase their computer skill to 7 and to upgrade their utility programs to rating 7 so as to maximize the benefit they get from their CMT Avatar' | However, access to the hacking pool means that a custom MPCP 6 deck can often perform better than a CMT Avatar, depending on host ratings, even though the Avatar has a higher MPCP rating. The plot below shows a comparison between a CMT Avatar and a custom MPCP 6. Both deckers are assumed to have started with Computer 6 and have picked up all relevant cyberware and bioware. Because the decker with the custom MPCP 6 has spent significant time/effort in building their deck as well as programming rating 6 utilities, it is reasonable to assume that the decker with the CMT Avatar has also taken some effort to increase their computer skill to 7 and to upgrade their utility programs to rating 7 so as to maximize the benefit they get from their CMT Avatar' | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
**Cyberterminal Design** and the five **Program Design** skills are optional for early deck-building and programming. Without these skills, we default to Intelligence for design tests, but if we picked up everything on the the highly recommended 'ware list, our likelihood of failure without these skills for rating 6-8 parts/ | **Cyberterminal Design** and the five **Program Design** skills are optional for early deck-building and programming. Without these skills, we default to Intelligence for design tests, but if we picked up everything on the the highly recommended 'ware list, our likelihood of failure without these skills for rating 6-8 parts/ | ||
- | Because programming tests also get bonuses from a computer with sufficiently abundant active memory and from possessing a programming suite, the cyberterminal design skill is much more valuable than the five program design skills. In addition, cyberterminal design tests have TN = MPCP/2 (whereas program design tests have TN = 4, or 5 if program rating above 9), it is particularly important when building | + | Because programming tests also get bonuses from a computer with sufficiently abundant active memory and from possessing a programming suite, the cyberterminal design skill is much more valuable than the five program design skills. In addition, cyberterminal design tests have TN = MPCP/2 (whereas program design tests have TN = 4, or 5 if program rating above 9), it is particularly important when building MPCP 10 or 12 cyberdecks. NOTE: your design skills are used even if they don't meet/exceed the rating of the program/ |
==== Highly Recommended 'ware ==== | ==== Highly Recommended 'ware ==== | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
==== Notable Optional ' | ==== Notable Optional ' | ||
- | As optional items for consideration, | + | As optional items for consideration, |
+ | |||
+ | ==== Success Rates ==== | ||
+ | These tables show success rates for building MPCP 6 deck components by number of computer b/r dice and cyberterminal design dice. The time to build is the base time for the specific part divided by the number of successes you rolled. Success rates for programming are not shown here because they are typically easier (you can get TN bonuses from your computer having abundant active memory, and bonus dice from having a Programming Suite). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^Odds to Succeed | ||
+ | ^Cyberterminal Design dice ^6 ^7 ^8 ^9 ^10 ^ | ||
+ | |0 (default to 6/8 int) | ||
+ | |3 |98% |99% |99% |99% |99% | | ||
+ | |6 (e.g., r3 skillsoft + r3 driver) |99.93% |99.95% |99.96% |99.97% |99.98% | | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^Median # of Successes Rolled | ||
+ | ^Cyberterminal Design dice ^6 ^7 ^8 ^9 ^10 ^ | ||
+ | |0 (default to 6/8 int) |3/4 |3/4 |4/5 |4/5 |5/6 | | ||
+ | |3 |5 |6 |6 |7 |8 | | ||
+ | |6 (e.g., r3 skillsoft + r3 driver) |5 |6 |7 |8 |8 | | ||
==== Other CharGen Comments ==== | ==== Other CharGen Comments ==== | ||
Line 76: | Line 91: | ||
* microtronics workshop (15k nuyen) | * microtronics workshop (15k nuyen) | ||
- | This totals 41.4k nuyen, which can be covered by doing all the newbie Neophyte Guild autoruns, plus "idle nuyen" while programming and deck building, making it perfectly reasonable for a decker to start the game without having spent chargen resources on a store-bought cyberdeck. This assumes we picked up a Mitsuhama Z4 computer and a cooker | + | This totals 41.4k nuyen, which can be covered by doing all the newbie Neophyte Guild autoruns, plus "idle nuyen" while programming and deck building, making it perfectly reasonable for a decker to start the game without having spent chargen resources on a store-bought cyberdeck. This nuyen cost assumes we picked up a Mitsuhama Z4 computer and a cooker |
NOTE: There are a number of parts and programs included here that aren't necessary for bare-bones paydata farming, though the cost difference is only 5k nuyen. | NOTE: There are a number of parts and programs included here that aren't necessary for bare-bones paydata farming, though the cost difference is only 5k nuyen. | ||
+ | |||
+ | All that said, **it takes a lot of time to build a deck**, on the order of a week IRL for a deck with MPCP 6 using a char-gen level character. If you choose this route, you will want to ensure that your character is able to do non-matrix things during your playtime and have your character do the longer programming/ | ||
==== The Cyberdeck ==== | ==== The Cyberdeck ==== |